I
am going to discus some common thinking errors made everywhere but I
am going to put them in a sports context. Knowing the common errors
we all make by both not thinking and poor thinking that can cause
massive difficulties, with these you may go in to the first stage of
grief which is denial, but you are just human and many errors are
part of the human condition rather than personal, the effects for you
though are personal.
Making
categorical errors is common in all areas of life but I will stick to
my professional area for examples. It is mainly about the words
different and same which sounds so simple. Sometimes there are areas
where there are subtle differences but the mistake can be made even
when there are large differences that is of course ‘not same’.
Treating different things as the same often leads to problems and is
incorrect. Categories can often be agreed or arbitrary for
convenience rather than real world. Once the agreement is made or
there is a real difference. It is common to blur and then eliminate
the boundaries between different things.
As
the Confusion quote:
A superior man, in regard to what he does not know, shows a cautious reserve. If names be not correct, language is not in accordance with the truth of things. If language be not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot be carried on to success. When affairs cannot be carried on to success, proprieties and music do not flourish. When proprieties and music do not flourish, punishments will not be properly awarded. When punishments are not properly awarded, the people do not know how to move hand or foot. Therefore a superior man considers it necessary that the names he uses may be spoken appropriately, and also that what he speaks may be carried out appropriately. What the superior man requires is just that in his words there may be nothing incorrect.
— Confucius, Analects, Book XIII, Chapter 3, verses 4-7, translated by James Legge
A
clarity in language was identified thousands of years ago as a need
for wisdom not just by Confucius but by
Plato in Athens and Patanjali’s Yoga Sutra who
make similar observations.
In
sport and fitness there is plenty of emotional input. The desire to
do something or win is high. Wanting so bad you are fully prepared to
believe any encouraging suggestion. This motivation to meet desires
and results rather than actual achievement and actual performance is
a constant trap that reduces real progress. The use of critical
thinking is often missing due to the evolutionary factors to peoples
perception. Early in life we attribute many things to luck/skill or
ability/inability depending on the result. Perception is hard to
influence after experience of perceived circumstance has given
direction
to our thought.
Science
in sport is even ignored by high performers. To gain high performance
or good levels of health, you have to do effective preparation and
practice to get real results. Early real explanation and correction
is needed. Differentiating what works and scientifically why and how.
I will explain some terms and situations common to sport and fitness
where I see systematic errors.
The
first obvious error is incorrect technique. This though needs to be
defined, feel free to argue the definitions but if your definitions
are wrong it may hurt. Correct technique in sports is physics. The
Biomechanics of the body rely on forces and the direction of these
forces as they are applied in collaboration. Simple examples are
swimming where the water offers greater resistance then air. If you
hit water really hard with a flat hand it is a slap but if you make
your hand very streamlined it will cut through with minimal
resistance. Not hard and yet many people have technique that has
resistance to the direction they want to travel and a subsequent
small force to propel in the opposite direction. They often do the
opposite they streamline the push or pull and resist the forward
momentum. This happens physically and is a metaphor for all progress.
Reduce resistance towards goal and maximise force to move towards it.
The term squat for instance can
be used for bad technical movement that likely produces injury. A
good squat will follow good physics (mechanics) and be safe and have
higher performance.
There
are different parts of preparation and performance. The first mistake
is jumping in with no preparation hoping natural talent will beat
prepared opposition. Deliberate preparation to reduce resistance and
increase movement towards your goal is needed. One word used in
exercise is specificity where for example press ups improve press ups
with some help to other actions, but have little benefit to actions
that do not have an upper body press. Many people do the wrong
exercises or programmes to get the desired results. The fashion for
body building with weights has been misapplied and reduced potential
and actual performance for
many. Big muscles for body building do not help many sportspeople as
the muscles get in the way and slow them down. That does not mean do
not train with weights it means do it correctly for your needs
towards your goal. Long distance athletes do not look like
Body-builders and vice versa they may both train with weights. There
are more subtle differences between Body-builders and strength
athletes (Olympic weightlifting, power lifting) and Rugby. Here
slight differences to the weight, sets and reps are needed for the
different aims. Specific preparation for each event is needed and
understanding the requirements of different sports and even health
are often badly guessed. These
categories are related to specific outcomes aligning them is vital.
Stage
one is learning physical and mental skills. Evidence of the
scientific variety pretty much backs up the general empirical and
traditional ideas. ‘Healthy
body, healthy mind’ holds water as do many other aphorisms.
Learning is done best in a conducive environment with motivation
towards learning. Simple carrot and stick motivation helps and the
reduction of distractions (resistance), many social and cultural
disablers appear with loud statement of perceptions of egos. There is
an important category mistake the difference between performer and
preparer. Being an excellent performer in your competitive group is
no magic bullet for success in other conditions like coaching.
Whether competitive or in helping others. The selfish dedication to
beat those in front are pretty much opposite to those properties of
effective helping (more selfless!). Separating
learning of skills and tactics and conditioning and performance leads
to clearer results. Learning is not performing and conditioning is
not learning etcetera and setting each up deliberately and clearly
rather than a mix of all where they interfere with each other.
I
regularly see people wanting to learn and improve performance in
competitive situations by competing only. Well the winner is the best
prepared. Quite often the person with the biggest immediate
advantages initially, but you need to prepare for higher levels
of competition. Learning and
development is not a competitive process even if the motivations are.
As children, the best prepared is the larger, older child. Once a
skill or tactic has been learned in a calm relaxed supportive manner
then it can be slowly practised with increasing resistance. If you
cannot perform a skill without pressure how do you hope to perform
under intense pressure. A prepared opponent will not let you!
So
stage one is learning, stage two is practice. Different stages but
they do overlap so more able people sometimes skip stages
or merge into each other. You
need a good supporter (teacher/coach)
to know who needs stage 1 and who can move quick to stage 2. The hard
job for the teacher is not distinguishing actual ability and
performances but dealing with the learners perception of ability and
often parents perception as well. Some sports or activities who
likely use this sort of progression are more closed sports where
competition is often singular, where as more open sports like team
sports or sports with a higher number of different skills can
get stuck in an all in (lack of) method of training.
The mistake is in open sports is insufficient learning and practice
of foundation skills before immersion in competitive situations. The
bigger child will probably want this most as they have the initial
advantage and will probably
win!
Another
stage is training. Here skills already to appropriate levels of
performance are practised in conditions closer to competition and
under some pressure are worked on. Correct technique needs to be
encouraged to reduce skill deterioration in over competitive
situations.
The
final stage is competition. It can contain learning, practice and
training benefits, but is more about performance and then results.
Lop sided competition of very able and low ability is not competition
as the skills of the low side are insufficient leading only to
scrappy survival battling detrimental to skill development for higher
levels of performance. Early bad habits often limit eventual
development and performance.
This
set of stages is a set of categories and errors in distinguishing
them and applying them result in lower performance. Sport has the
advantage of clear results. Some people compete in things confidently
in spite of never or only once succeeding rather than using the
things that work most often. This categorising set is not set in
stone but useful. This pattern of unclear categories and
misunderstanding ‘same and difference’ is common in all areas of
life. The errors in sport and fitness of bad technique, poor
learning, unpractised and untrained and of course poor performance
are common and resistant to change. Still with so many doing this it
makes the few who don’t look good. So I’m off to learn some stuff
then practice and train.
There
are many areas and occasions where one thing is thought and acted on
as if it’s one thing when it is another. A universal error is to
treat an approximation as a fact. Let alone an approximation of an
approximation, like in maths where a rounding up or down can be made
in the right circumstance but then this rounding is used in another
calculation with more rounding. The accuracy is a little off from the
first rounding and is then magnified with the second rounding, vastly
effecting accuracy. In sport there can be false belief created from
not understanding the lack of accuracy and clarity of definition and
purpose.
No comments:
Post a Comment