One
pseudo advantage for education is that competition is controlled. To
start a school or bring innovation to an existing school has been
controlled by the system up to the politicians. Customers just cannot
afford to go elsewhere. Restrictions to those employed as teachers
has been tightened to certified teachers which is controlled within
the same system in the name of standards. Every so often there is a
push for more controlled restrictions limiting who is employed and
what can be done by schools. Recently this has changed a little with
the development of academies and free schools which allow other
methods of management, which may give flexibility to how they are
run. Many of the barriers and restrictions may now be challenged.
When innovation is allowed and produces results then change may be
divested throughout the industry. Universities may have the first
problem though as fixed 3 years+ degrees only fit so many people.
There are many jobs that value experience as included in
apprenticeships that means 3 years is too long to not gain
experience. Other industries have dynamic pressures that cannot allow
people to become out of date. Many degrees are out of date by the
time of completion.
Customers
will look for better alternatives and make demands on the existing
system which may now be met. Flexibility for individuals rather than
herd teaching will become a major force for change. Others may also
fill gaps. In many industries the cherry picking profitable areas has
occurred, post 16 years education is most vulnerable.
Technology
already has the ability to individualise some areas of education.
Online and other CBT courses with video lectures (can be re-watched
where lecturers cannot repeat anywhere near as much). There are also
packages that include questions where some will not let you move to
the next level till you have got 10 questions in a row right. This
allows those with pre-existing knowledge or who pick up quick to
progress faster. Those who are struggling can be seen (via IT system)
and flagged where assistance can be given. Another factor is that
computer based system can include analysis of problems and allow
continuous improvement that teachers cannot do at present. Reducing
the sticking points that learners commonly experience and also
analysing the solutions to the sticking points and improving
progress.
This
model already exists in the Khan Academy with a lot of academic
subjects. Other online teaching by teachers is already available.
Home schooling can provide much that is done in a school in less time
and less stress for the learner. Other organisations may fill the
other functions not covered by ICT. Only the official qualification
needs to be set (some areas have this already e.g.s. IT: Microsoft,
Cisco courses etc.).
Restricting
teachers to those who are academic for many subjects is an ill-judged
limit. I have met people teaching without any qualifications and some
number amongst the best at teaching. I have been taught much by
people who do not share the same language and even people who make up
their own (dumpf is not a regular (Oxbridge do not teach it anyway)
word but made the point perfectly). When teachers have small groups
rather than a crowd of 20, 30+, then many elements are easier to
control. Also teachers can stick to their specialisms and strengths,
rather than having discipline and group learning and institutional
tasks being the major tasks or the covering of other subjects.
Also
being able to proceed at an individuals own pace and not at a groups
pace will be advantageous for most learners at different times. Some
learners can progress much faster than the rest of the group can.
Others need to follow their strengths or follow tangents of interest.
Some standard assessments that meet real applied levels both for the
real world but also for academia. These can be taken when a learner
is ready not at a fixed time and age. As long as a learner has enough
proof of ability when the proof is needed, the time and order can be
more flexible. With more flexibility, when a learner has achieved in
their strength they will have more skills and confidence when they
attempt their weaker areas. An example maybe where a student finds
languages easier and interesting they could develop these skills
early on and could specialise in these and later look at important
areas that they did not have clear ability or interest. Those that
find languages difficult can have a go early on with no pressure and
move onto their strengths, rather than wasting time with little
progress. If languages are more relevant later, then with progress in
their strengths, a greater understanding of themselves, learning and
the world they will have a better chance to progress. To become
fluent in a foreign language is best done by starting very early.
Fluency though is only needed by a small portion of people where as
language skills with an accent may be sufficient for the majority.
As
well as computer based training (CBT), technology will follow
military training with simulation training. The most obvious example
are the flight simulators that cost a fraction of flying fighter
jets. They increase all the time the scope of training and practice
they can provide. Many areas of military training and practice now
have simulator options such as vehicles, equipment but also reality
simulators for soldier and officer roles and situations. This allows
adaptable training for when it might not be safe or for problems that
are rare can be prepared for at less cost with higher standards and
more repetitions. Along with computer game development and reduced
technology size and relative cost more options will appear. This will
appear for teaching, practice and assessment closer to real world
usage rather than class room isolation.
Much
progress has already been made that will be re-purposed for education possibly outside of educational establishments in industry and
commercial organisations particularly if state education system fails
to progress. Cost savings are a prime motivation but hopefully a
quality motivation could be encouraged.
No comments:
Post a Comment